Аверсия: опыт российского конституционного правосудия
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Аверсия: опыт российского конституционного правосудия
Annotation
PII
S086904990000617-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
57-69
Abstract
Constitutional process of modern Russia is in the focus of the article. The authors concentrateon the mechanisms of legal institutions based on two models of constitutionalism: aversive andaspirational. The authors criticize constitutional process and politics shaped under the Russian aversiveconstitutionalism.
Keywords
constitutional models, aversive constitutionalism, constitutional review, judicial politics, reinterpretation of constitutional rights
Date of publication
07.05.2013
Number of purchasers
0
Views
974
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should sign in

1

References



Additional sources and materials

Aranovskij K., Knyazev S. Rossijskij konstitutsionalizm: sudebnyj, sudejskij, sudnyj…. // Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya. 2011. № 3.
Akhremenko A. Otsenka ehffektivnosti gosudarstva v proizvodstve publichnykh uslug: teoreticheskaya model' i metodika izmereniya // POLIS. 2012. №1.
Bozh'ev V. “Tikhaya revolyutsiya” Konstitutsionnogo Suda v ugolovnom protsesse Rossijskoj Federatsii // Rossijskaya yustitsiya. 2000. № 10.
Bondar' N. Sudebnyj (zhivoj) konstitutsionalizm: doktrina i praktika // Sovremennyj rossijskij konstitutsionalizm: doktrina i praktika. Rostov-n/D.,–SPb., 2011.
Vil'dkhaber L. Otnosheniya mezhdu Evropejskim sudom po pravam cheloveka i natsional'nymi sudebnymi organami // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2007. № 1 (58).
Ganino M., Kovler A. Rossijskaya konstitutsiya: vzglyad iz Italii (interv'yu glavnogo redaktora zhurnala s professorom M. Ganino) // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1999. № 6.
Goncharov M. Pravosudnyj i normotvorcheskij aspekty dejstviya reshenij i pravovykh pozitsij Konstitutsionnogo Suda vo vremeni // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. 2007. № 19.
Zhilin G. Sootnoshenie tselevykh ustanovok grazhdanskogo i konstitutsionnogo sudoproizvodstv // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 1999. № 5–6.
Zor'kin V. Rossiya i Konstitutsiya v XXI veke. M., 2007.
Konstitutsiya v XXI veke: sravnitel'no-pravovoe issledovanie. M., 2011.
Kravets I. Konstitutsionnaya zhaloba: traditsii i novatsii v mekhanizme garantij prav i svobod lichnosti // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2003. № 8.
Kryazhkov V., Kryazhkova O. Pravovye pozitsii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federatsii v ego interpretatsii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2005. №11.
Kuznechenkova V. Vliyanie reshenij Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF na nalogovoe zakonodatel'stvo // Sovremennyj rossijskij konstitutsionalizm: doktrina i praktika. Rostov-na-Donu, SPb., 2011.
Luman N. Obschestvo kak sotsial'naya sistema. M., 2004.
Medushevskij A. Teoriya konstitutsionnykh tsiklov // POLIS. 2006. № 2.
Merkel' V., Kruassan A. Formal'nye i neformal'nye instituty v defektnykh demokratiyakh // POLIS. 2002. № 1–2.
Mironov B. Uroki revolyutsii 1917 goda, ili Komu na Rusi zhit' plokho // Rodina. 2012. № 1–2.
Morschakova T. Konstitutsionnaya kontseptsiya sudoproizvodstva // Rossijskaya yustitsiya. 2001. № 10.
Petrukhin I., Baturov G., Morschakova T. Teoreticheskie osnovy ehffektivnosti pravosudiya. M., 1979.
Sazonov B. Organizatsiya kak sotsial'nyj institut (http://www.fondgp.ru/lib/chteniya/xv/text/10).
Shlezinger A. Tsikly amerikanskoj istorii. M., 1992.
Bailey M. Comparable Preference Estimates across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress, and Presidency // American Journal of Political Science. 2007. № 51.
Baum L. Judicial Politics: Still a Distinctive Field // Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington (DC), 1983.
Baum L. Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme Court // American Political Science Review. 1988. № 9(82).
Canon B., Johnson Ch. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, 1999.
Carrigan C., Coglianese C. The Politics of Regulation: From New Institutionalism to New Governance // The Annual Review of Political Science. 2011. № 14.
Clayton C. The Supreme Court and Political Jurisprudence: New and Old Institutionalisms // Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago, 1999.
Collier D., Levitsky S. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research // World Politics. 1997. Vol. 49. № 3.
Cook B. Measuring the Significance of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions // Journal of Politics. 1993. № 55 (November).
Dudziak M. Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy. Princeton, 2000.
Gates J. Theory, Methods, and the New Institutionalism in Judicial Research. In American Courts: A Critical Assessment. Washington, 1991.
Ginsburg T. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge, 2003.
Grofman B., Brazill Th. Identifying the Median Justice on the Supreme Court Through Multidimensional Scaling: Analysis of the ‘Natural Courts’ 1953–1991 // Public Choice. 2002. Vol. 6. № 112.
Juviler P. Human Rights and Russia’s Future // Parker School Journal of East European Law. 1995. Vol. 2.
Levitsky S., Way L. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York, 2010.
Levitsky S., Way L. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism // Journal of Democracy. 2002. Vol. 2. № 13.
Mishler W., Sheehan R. The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions // American Political Science Review. 1993. № 87.
Moustafa T., Ginsburg T. Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics. In Rule By Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge, 2008.
Owens R. The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting // American Journal of Political Science. 2010. № 54 (April).
Paleev M. The Establishment of an Independent Judiciary in Russia // Parker School Journal of East European Law. 1994. № 1.
Reedy Ch. The Supreme Court and Congress on Abortion: An Analysis of Comparative Institutional Capacity (Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association), 1982.
Scheppele K. Aspirational and Aversive Constitutionalism: the Case for Studying CrossConstitutional Influence through Negative Models // International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2003. № 1 (April).
Schmitz G. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Austria 1918–1920 // Ratio Juris. 2003. Vol. 16. № 2.
Schwarzer W. Civil and Human Rights and the Courts under the New Constitution of Russian Federation // The International Lawyer. 1994. Vol. 28. № 3.
Shapiro M. Courts. Chicago, 1981.
Stone-Sweet A. Constitutional Courts and Parliamentary Democracy // The Politics of Dlegation. London, Portland, 2002.
Trochev A. Judging Russia: The Role of the Constitutional Court in Russian Politics 1990–2006.
Cambridge, 2008.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate