Human capital of the Russian workers and workers from other countries
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Human capital of the Russian workers and workers from other countries
Annotation
PII
S086904990011380-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Nataliya Latova 
Occupation: Senior Researcher
Affiliation: Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the RAS
Address: 24/25 Krzhizhanovski st. Moscow, 117218, Russia
Edition
Pages
33-50
Abstract

In the modern social discourse there are two interpretations of the concept “human capital”. The use of the concept “human capital” in the classical (narrow) meaning gives the researcher favorable opportunities for obtaining quantitative data on the level of training workers, helps to fix and describe the amount of qualification resource that people operate on the labor market. For example, the comparative study of a number of countries (on the basis of the International Social Survey Programme ISSP “Work Orientations” 2015) revealed a good level of the Russian workers’ basic education, as well as their accumulation of experience in the work process (ie, general and specific human capital). At the same time, among the Russian workers, there is little practice in further training and additional education. The desire to get an advanced basic education (up to the highest one) looks irrational against the background of further total disregard for learning as such. It is difficult to understand this pattern of behavior of the Russian workers within the framework of the classical treatment of human capital. Broader interpretation of human capital including besides educational characteristics, a more various range of indicators helps to resolve behavior paradoxes in the sphere of labor employment. Under this approach, human capital is not only professional skills and knowledge, but also some mental characteristics closely related to the norms of national culture. The study of this problem was based on the data of the all-Russian study carried out in 2010 by the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences on the methodology of G. Hofstede VSM94. The concept of human capital in this interpretation takes on a great explanatory power (giving the opportunity to view people’s behavior not only as a purely rational one), giving vent to the theory and practice of management. In the framework of this approach, the study of cultural norms provides an understanding that in the Russian labor culture, regular upgrading of skills (ie, renewal of human capital) is not a universally recognized value, because this kind of behavior largely depends on the existence of a laboring desire to personal success, desire and ability to self-presentation, etc. At the same time, the production culture of the Russian workers, reflected in the cultural indicators of G. Hofstede, fits well with the primordially Russian highly effective labor organization in the form of artels.

Keywords
workers, comparative study, additional vocational education, training, general human capital, specific human capital, human potential, cultural characteristics, Hofstede, ethnometrics, artel labour organization, Russia
Received
10.06.2018
Date of publication
10.06.2018
Number of purchasers
8
Views
1142
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2018
1

References

1. Anikin V. (2017) Chelovecheskiy kapital: stanovlenie koncepcii i osnovnye traktovki [Human Capital: Genesis of Basic Concepts and Interpretations]. Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 120–148.

2. Anikin V.A. (2013) Motivation to Work in Russia: The Case of Protracted Transition from Noncompetitive to Competitive System. The Journal of Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 8, pp. 35–60.

3. Arkhipova M.J., Egorov A.A., Sirotin V.P. (2017) Otdacha ot obrazovaniya v Rossii i na Ukraine: sravnitel’nyy analiz [Returns to schooling in Russia and Ukraine: Comparative analysis]. Prikladnaya ekonometrika, vol. 47, pp. 100–122.

4. Becker G.S. (2003) Chelovecheskoe povedenie: ekonomicheskiy podhod. Izbrannye trudy po ekonomicheskoj teorii [The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Selected Writings on Economic Theory]. Moscow: GU–HSE.

5. Becker G.S. (1962) Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. The Journal of Political Economy, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 9–49.

6. Becker G.S., Hubbard W.H., Murphy K.M. (2010) Explaining the Worldwide Boom in Higher Education of Women. Journal of Human Capital, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 203–241.

7. Bondarenko N. (2017) Stanovlenie v Rossii nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya: analiz na osnove rezul’tatov obshherossiyskih oprosov vzroslogo naselenija strany. Informacionnyj bjulleten’ [The formation of continuing education in Russia: an analysis based on the results of the nationwide surveys of the adult population of the country. News bulletin]. Moscow: Nacional’niyj issledovatel’skiy universitet “Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki”.

8. Cherednichenko G.A. (2014) Obrazovatel’nye i professional’nye traektorii rossijskoy molodezhi (na materialah sociologicheskih issledovaniy) [Educational and professional trajectories of the Russian youth (on the materials of sociological research)]. Moscow: Centr social’nogo prognozirovaniya i marketinga.

9. Didenko D.V. (2014) Finansirovanie rossiyskogo obrazovanija i nauki: rol’ institucio-nal’nyh sektorov ekonomiki [Financing of the Russian education and science: inputs of institutional sectors of the economy]. Finansovyj zhurnal, no. 1 (19), pp. 111–122.

10. Ehrenberg R.G., Smith R.S. (1996) Sovremennaja jekonomika truda. Teorija i gosudarstvennaya politika [Modern Labor Economics. Theory and Public Policy]. Moscow: Izdatel’skiy dom moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.

11. Gimpelson V., Kapeliushnikov R., Oshchepkov A. (2016) Premiya za special’nyy stazh v Rossii: vozvrashhenie k teme [Return to tenure revisited]. Ekonomicheskij zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 553–587.

12. Hofstede G. (2001) Culture’s Сonsequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

13. Karavay A. (2016) Chelovecheskiy kapital rossiyskih rabochih: sostoyanie i faktory [The human capital of the Russian working class: status and factors]. Vestnik Instituta Sociologii, no. 17, pp. 91–112.

14. Konstantinovskiy D. (2010) Rabochaja molodezh’ v rossiyskom obshhestve: orientacii, obrazovanie i chelovecheski kapital [Working youth in the Russian society: orientation, education and human capital]. Social’nye faktory konsolidacii Rossiyskogo obshchestva: sociologicheskoe izmerenie [Social factors of consolidation of the Russian society: the sociological dimension]. Moscow: Novyy hronograf, pp. 91–115.

15. Latova N.V. (2016) Vliyanie krizisa na udovletvorennost’ rossiyan svoey zhizn’ju i ih social’no-psihologicheskoe samochuvstvie [The Impact of the crisis on the life satisfaction of Russians and their social and psychological well-being]. Rossijskoe obshhestvo i vyzovy vremeni. Kniga tret’ya [Russian Society and the Challenges of Time. Book Three]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir, pp. 41–65.

16. Latova N.V., Tikhonova N.E. (2010) Modernizaciya i harakteristiki rossijskoy nacional’noy mental’nosti [Modernization and characteristics of the Russian national mentality]. Gotovo li rossiyskoe obshchestvo k modernizacii? [Is Russian society ready to upgrade?], Moscow: Ves’ Mir, pp. 273–297.

17. Loose G. (1988) Vocational education in transition: a seven-country study of curricula for lifelong vocational learning. The UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning (http://www.uil.unesco.org/lifelong-learning/vocational-education-transition-seven-countrystudy-curricula-lifelong-vocational).

18. Neft’, gaz, modernizaciya obshhestva [Oil, gas, modernization of society]. (2010) St- Petersburg: Ekonomicheskaja shkola.

19. Rimashevskaya N.M. (2001) Kachestvennyy potencial naseleniya Rossii: vzglyad v XXI vek [Qualitative potential of the population of Russia: a look into the 21st century]. Problemy prognozirovanija, no. 3, pp. 34–48.

20. Russia’s Persistent Weaknesses of Human Capital (2014) The Economist (http://www. businessinsider.com/russias-persistent-weaknesses-of-human-capital-2014–1).

21. Schultz T.W. (1972) Human Capital: Policy Issues and Research Opportunities. Human Resources. National Bureau of Economic Research (http://www.nber.org/chapters/c4126.pdf).

22. Schultz T.W. (1961) Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–17.

23. Soboleva I. (2007) Chelovecheskiy potencial rossijskoy ekonomiki: problemy sohraneniya i razvitiya [Human potential of the Russian economy: problems of conservation and development]. М.: Nauka.

24. Tikhonova N. (2017) Chelovecheskiy kapital professionalov i rukovoditeley: sostoyanie i dinamika [Human capital of professionals and managers: the condition and dynamic]. Vestnik Instituta sociologii, no. 21, pp. 140–165.

25. Tikhоnova N., Karavay A. (2017) Chelovecheskij kapital rossiyskih rabochih: obshhee sostoyanie i specificheskie osobennosti [The Human Capital of Russian Workers: The Overall State and Its Specifics]. Mir Rossii, no. 3, pp. 6–35.

26. Tikhоnova N., Karavay A. (2018)) Chelovecheskiy kapital rossiyskih rabochih: sostoyanie, dinamika, faktory [The human capital of Russian workers: state, dynamics, factors]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 3, pp. 17–22.

27. Tomer J. (2015) Integrating human capital with human development: the path to a more productive and humane economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate