Young People in Socio-economic and Ethical Coordinate System
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
Young People in Socio-economic and Ethical Coordinate System
Annotation
PII
S086904990011561-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Elena M. Avraamova 
Occupation: Head of Department
Affiliation: Institute of Social Analysis and Forecasting of The Russian Presidential Academy of National and Public Administration
Address: Prechistenskaya nab., 11, 119034, Moscow, Russian Federation
Edition
Pages
86-98
Abstract

The article is dedicated to the study of young people views about mechanisms of social order and vertical mobility. On the basis of collected sociological data the following issues are considered: how young people estimate socio-economical situation of the country in a stable period and in a period of crisis; in what degree young people perceive social inequality as painful and consider it fair; what main reasons of wealth and poverty they think; what resources young people regard as the most efficient to achieve success and what models of labor behavior they choose for it. Analysis of obtained data leads to the conclusion that young people realize they live in a society which order is not perceived as fair by the most of its representatives. At the same time meritocratic type of social structure is believed to be equitable, effective mechanisms of vertical mobility are built basing on social relations which substitute competitive advantages of meritocratic type. But this collision is not perceived dramatically by young people, they perceive such contradiction as the established norm they need to be relate with building their models of behavior.

Keywords
young people, education, employment, vertical mobility, social equity, models of labor behavior
Received
15.09.2020
Date of publication
17.02.2017
Number of purchasers
1
Views
404
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

Publication text not found

References

1. Avraamova E.M., Maleva T.M. (2015) Social’nye resursy naselenija v uslovijah poteri jekonomicheskoj stabil’nosti [Social Resources of the Population in Terms of Loss of Social Stability]. Voprosy jekonomiki, no. 11, pp. 86–99.

2. Adaptacionnye strategii naselenija (2003) Pod red. E.M. Avraamovoj [Adaptation Strategies of the Population. E. Avraamova (ed.)] St.-Petersburg: Komp’juterburg.

3. Ezhemesjachnyj monitoring social’no-jekonomicheskogo polozhenija i samochuvstvija naselenija: 2015–2016 gg. (janvar’) (2016) Pod red. T.M. Malevoj [Monthly Monitoring of Socio-Economic Status and Health of Population: 2015–2016 (January). T. Maleva (ed.)]. Moscow: Izdatel’skij dom “Delo”, RANHiGS.

4. Gudkov L. (2013) Chelovek v nemoral’nom prostranstve: k sociologii morali v postsovetskom obshñhestve [People in no-Moral Space: Towards a Sociology of Morality in Post-Soviet Society]. Vestnik obshhestvennogo mnenija, no. 3–4, pp. 18–177.

5. Koulman Dzh. (2001) Kapital social’nyj i chelovecheskij [Capital Social and Human]. Obshñhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 3, pp. 122–139.

6. Pliskevich N.M. Chelovecheskiy kapital v transformiruyuscheysya Rossii [Human Capital in Transforming Russia]. Moscow: IE RAS.

7. Sheregi F. Je. (2013) Rossijskaja molodezh’: nastroenija ozhidanija cennostnye orientacii [The Russian Youth: Mood, Expectations and Value Orientations]. Moscow: Centr social’nogo prognozirovanija i marketinga.

8. Shevjakov A. Ju., Kiruta A. Ja. (2009) Neravenstvo, jekonomicheskij rost i demografija: neissledovannye vzaimosvjazi [Inequality, Economic Growth and Demography: Unexplored Relationships]. M.: ISJePN RAN; M-Studio.

9. Vertikal’naja mobil’nost’ rossijskogo obshchestva: 2000-e gody (2008) Pod red. E.M. Avraamovoj [Vertical mobility of Russian society: 2000-ies. E. Avraamova (ed.)] Moscow: M-Studio.

10. Zarubina N.N. (2016) Molodezh’ v uslovijah anomii [Youth in Conditions of Anomie]. Obshñhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 1, pp. 52–63.

11. Zorkaja N. (2008) Sovremennaja molodezh’: k probleme “defektnoj socializacii” [Today’s Youth: the problem of the “defective socialization”]. Vestnik obshñhestvennogo mnenija, no. 4, pp. 8–22.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate