Библиография

Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

Азимов А. Логика // Азимов А. Я, робот. М.. 1964.
Слобин Д., Грин Дж. Психолингвистика. М., 1976.
Тамбовцев В.Л. Институты-как-равновесия vs институты-как-правила // Журнал экономи- ческой теории. 2013. № 4.
Фрэзер Д.Д. Золотая ветвь. Исследование магии и религии. Т. 1. М., 2001.
Хомский Н. О понятии “правило грамматики” // Новое в лингвистике. М., 1965. Вып. IV.
Al-Amoudi I. Immanent Non-algorithmic Rules: an Ontological Study of Social Rules // Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 2010. Vol. 40. № 3.
Baum W.M. Rules, Culture, and Fitness // Behavior Analyst. 1995. Vol. 18. № 1.
Bernasconi-Kohn L. How not to Think about Rules and Rule-following: a Response to Stueber // Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2006. Vol. 36. №1.
Bunge S.A., Wallis J.D., Parker A., Brass M., Crone E.A., Hoshi E., Sakai K. Neural Circuitry
Underlying Rule Use in Humans and Nonhuman Primates // Journal of Neuroscience. 2005. Vol. 25. Is. 45.
Campos A., Dignum F., Dignum V. From Individuals to Social and Vice-versa // Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2009. Vol. 5485.
Clague C. Rule Obedience, Organizational Loyalty, and Economic Development // Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics.1993. Vol. 149. № 2.
Cullen C. The Trouble with Rules // The Psychologist. 1998. Part 10.
Davies M. Interaction without Reduction: the Relationship between Personal and Sub-personal Levels of Description // Mind & Society. 2000. Vol. 1. Is. 2.
Gerrans P. Tacit Knowledge, Rule Following and Pierre Bourdieu’s Philosophy of Social Science // Anthropological Theory. 2005. Vol. 5. № 1.
Gomolińska A. Derivability of Rules from Rule Complexes // Logic and Logical Philosophy. 2002. Vol. 10.
Gourlay S. Conceptualizing Knowledge Creation: a Critique of Nonaka’s Theory // Journal of Management Studies. 2006. Vol. 43. № 7.
Guala F. The Normativity of Lewis Conventions // Synthese. June 2012. Forthcoming. DOI 10.1007/s11229-012-0131-x Greif A., Kingston C. Institutions: Rules or Equilibria? // Political Economy of Institutions, Democracy and Voting. Berlin–Heidelberg, 2011.
Hands W. The Positive–Normative Dichotomy and Economics // Philosophy of Economics.
Vol. 13. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam, 2012.
Haukioja J. Is Solitary Rule-following Possible? // Philosophia. 2005. Vol. 32. Is. 1–4.
Hayes S.C., Hayes L.J. The Verbal Action of the Listener as a Basis for Rule-governance // Rule- governed Behavior: Cognition, Contingencies, and Instructional Control. New York, 1989.
Hodgson G.M. Economics and Institutions: a Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics. Cambridge, 1988.
Hodgson G.M. What are Institutions? // Journal of Economic Issues. 2006. Vol. XL. № 1.
Kaisla J. Market Process and the Firm: Some Indications of Rule-following and Entrepreneurship under Genuine Uncertainty. DRUID Working Paper № 98–17. Copenhagen. 1998.
Kapur B.K. A Communitarian Utility Function and its Social and Economic Implications // Economics and Philosophy. 1999. Vol. 15. Is. 1.
Kripke S. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language. Cambridge (Mass.), 1982.
Lawson T. Reorienting economics. London, 2003.
Lorini G. Can Constitutive Rules Create a Practice? // Praxis Filosófi ca. 2012. № 34.
Montola M. The Invisible Rules of Role-playing: the Social Framework of Role-playing Process // International Journal of Role-playing. 2008. Is. 1.
Murphy R.A., Mondragón E., Murphy V.A. Rule Learning by Rats // Science. 2008. Vol. 319 (5871).
Nielsen K. The Concept of Tacit Knowledge – a Critique // Outlines: Critical Social Studies. 2002. № 2.
Noelle D.C. On the Neural Basis of Rule-guided Behavior // Journal of Integrative Neuroscience. 2012. Vol. 11. № 4.
Ogien A. Rules and Details: From Wittgenstein and Rawls to the Study of Practices // Journal of Classical Sociology. 2009. Vol. 9. № 4.
Ostrom E. An Agenda for the Study of Institutions // Public Choice.1986.Vol. 48. Is. 1.
Patterson D. Normativity and Objectivity in Law // William and Mary Law Review. 2001. Vol. 43. Is. 1.
Pelaez M., Moreno R. Four Dimensions of Rules and Their Correspondence to Rule-governed Behavior: a Taxonomy // Behavioral Development. 1999. Vol. 8. № 1.
Pleasants N. Nothing is Concealed: De-centering Tacit Knowledge and Rules from Social Theory // Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. 1996. Vol. 26. № 3.
Rakoczy H., Brosche N., Warneken F., Tomasello M. Young Children’s Understanding of the
Context-relativity of Normative Rules in Conventional Games // British Journal of Developmental Psychology. 2009. Vol. 27.
Rakoczy H., Tomasello M. Done wrong or said wrong? Young Children Understand the Normative Directions of fi t of Different Speech Acts // Cognition, 2009. Vol. 13. № 2.
Reese H.W. Rules and Rule-governance: Cognitive and Behavioristic Views // Rule-governed Behavior: Cognition, Contingencies, and instructional Control. New York, 1989.
Ribes-Iñesta E. Instructions, Rules, and Abstraction: a Misconstrued Relation // Behavior and Philosophy. 2000. Vol. 28. Is. 1.
Schmidt M., Rakoczy H., Tomasello M. Young Children Enforce Social Norms Selectively Depending on the vViolator’s Group Affi liation // Cognition. 2012. Vol. 124. № 3.
Shimanoff S.B. Communication Rules: Theory and Research. Beverly Hills (Cal), 1980.
Sillari G. Rule-following as Coordination: a Game-theoretic Approach // Synthese. 2013. Vol. 190. Is. 5.
Skinner B.F. An Operant Analysis of Problem Solving // Problem Solving: Research, Method and Theory. New York, 1966.
Stueber K. How to Think about Rules and Rule Following // Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2005.Vol. 35. № 3.
Tsoukas H. Do We Really Understand Tacit Knowledge? // The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Cambridge (Mass.), 2003.
Vanberg V.J. Rational Choice, Preferences over Actions and Rule-following Behavior. Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics. № 07/6. Walter Eucken Institute. Freiburg, 2007.
Wallis J.D., Anderson K.C., Miller E.K. Single Neurons in Prefrontal Cortex Encode Abstract Rules // Nature. 2001. Vol. 411.
Wallis J., North D. Coordination and Coercion: the Nature of Rules, Governments, States, and Social Dynamics. Paper Prepared for the All-UC Conference “Historical Perspective on Political Elites and Economic Growth” at Chapman University. May 31–June 1, 2013 (http://allucgroup.iga.ucda- vis. edu/conferences/historical-perspectives-on-political-elites-conf/papers/WallisNorth_GS.Chap- man.2013.pdf).
Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Investigations. New York, 1953.
Wyman E., Rakoczy H., Tomasello M. Normativity and Context in Young Children’s Pretend Play // Cognitive Development. 2009. Vol. 24. № 2.
Zhou Y., Zhang Y. Rule Calculus: Semantics, Axioms and Applications // Logics in Artifi cial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2008. Vol. 5293.