Везде
RUSSIAN LAWYERS: THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY IN IMPERFECT INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
RUSSIAN LAWYERS: THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PROFESSIONAL COMMUNITY IN IMPERFECT INSTITUTIONAL ENVIRONMENT
Annotation
PII
S086904990000616-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Andrei Yakovlev  Anton Kazun
Edition
Issue 6
Pages
39-56
Abstract
The Russian Law community is analyzed to evaluate its potential for collective action under imperfect institutional environment: joint activity to monitor compliance with professional ethics, quality of legal education, representing the interests of professional groups at the state level. Two hypotheses are tested: 1) Lawyers with high ethical standards impose a higher demand for collective action; 2) Negative personal experience of customers rights violations by law enforcement authorities may further motivate lawyers to act together. The conclusion is that, with the support of “healthy core” of the legal community a tool for competent and independent assessment of the state of law enforcement in Russia can be created.
Keywords
Law community, collective action, professional ethical values, independent assessment of the judicial system
Date of publication
03.11.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1169
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion
1

References



Additional sources and materials

Barschevskij M. Organizatsiya i deyatel'nost' advokatury v Rossii. Nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. M., 2000.
 Kazun A. Vybor yuristov mezhdu vygodoj i professional'noj otvetstvennost'yu: razvitie individual'nogo urovnya kontrolya // Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. 2013. № 5.
 Kak sud'i prinimayut resheniya: ehmpiricheskie issledovaniya prava. M., 2012.
 Mishina E. Mnogolikie rossijskie yuristy // Kakovo ehto — byt' yuristom? M., 2010.
 Mrovchinski R. Institutsial'naya professionalizatsiya yuristov v usloviyakh gosudarstven- nogo sotsializma i postsotsializma: sravnitel'nyj analiz organizatsij professional'nogo samoupravleniya v Pol'she i Rossii // Antropologiya professij: granitsy zanyatosti v ehpokhu nestabil'nosti. M., 2012.
 Paneyakh Eh. Transaktsionnye ehffekty plotnogo regulirovaniya na stykakh organizatsij (Na primere rossijskoj pravookhranitel'noj sistemy) // Politiya. 2011. № 2.
 Paneyakh Eh.L., Titaev K.D., Volkov V.V., Primakov D.Ya. Obvinitel'nyj uklon v ugolovnom protsesse: faktor prokurora (Seriya “Analiticheskie zapiski po problemam pravoprimeneniya”). SPb., 2010.
 Pozdnyakov M. Smysl i dvusmyslennost' obvinitel'nogo uklona // Kak sud'i prinimayut resheniya: ehmpiricheskie issledovaniya prava. M., 2013.
 Poludnyakova V.I. Sud prodolzhaet priem. L., 1987.
 Troshev A. Kak sud'i arestovyvayut i opravdyvayut: sovetskoe nasledie v ugolovnom sudo- proizvodstve // Kak sud'i prinimayut resheniya: ehmpiricheskie issledovaniya prava. M., 2012.
 Yakovlev A.A., Zudin A.Yu., Golikova V.V. Biznes-assotsiatsii i ikh rol' v protsessakh moderni- zatsii v Rossii // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2011. № 3.
 Abbott A. Professional Ethics // The American Journal of Sociology. 1983. № 5.
 Akerlof G. The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1970. Vol. 84.
 Bear J. Survey of the Legal Profession – Workmen’s Compensation and the Lawyer // Columbia Law Review. 1961. Vol. 51. № 8.
 Brante T. Sociological Approaches to the Profession // Acta Sociologica. 1988. Vol. 31. № 2.
 Erlanger S., Klegon D. Socialization Effects of Professional School: the Law School Experience and Student Orientations to Public Interest Concerns // Law & Society Review. 1978. Vol. 13. № 1.
 Evetts J. The Sociological Analysis of Professionalism: Occupational Change in the Modern World // International Sociology. 2003. № 2.
 Feldbrugge F., Berg G., Simons W. Encyclopedia of Soviet Law. BRILL. 1985.
 Freidson E. Professionalism. The Third Logic. Cambridge, 2001.
 Halliday T.C. Beyond Monopoly: Lawyers, State Crises and Professional Empowerment. Chicago, 1987.
 Johnson E. Lawyers’ Choice: a Theoretical Appraisal of Litigation Investment Decisions // Law & Society Review. 1981. № 3/4.
 Larson M. The Rise of Professionalism. Berkeley, 1977.
 Locke R. Building Trust. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Political Science Association, Hilton Towers. San Francisco, (Cal) 2001.
 Mertz E. The Language of Law School: Learning to “Think” like a Lawyer. Oxford, 2007.
 Mindes M., Acock A. Trickster, Hero, Helper: a Report on the Lawyer Image // American Bar Foundation Research Journal. 1982. № 1.
 Mrowczynski R. Self-Regulation of Legal Professions in State Socialism: Poland and Russia Compared // Legal History. Journal of the Max Planck Institute for European Legal History. 2012. № 20.
 Overman S., Foss L. Professional Ethics: an Empirical Test of the “Separatist Thesis”// Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 1991. № 2.
 Parker C., Evans A. Inside Lawyers Ethics. Cambridge, 2007.
 Parsons T. The Professions and Social Structure // Social Forces. 1939. № 4.
 Razi G. Legal Education and the Role of the Lawyer in the Soviet Union and the Countries of Eastern Europe // California Law Review. 1960. Vol. 48. Iss. 5.
 Saks M. Professions and the Public Interest: Medical Power, Altruism and Alternative Medicine. London, 1995.
 Schneider V. State Theory, Governance and the Logic of Regulation and Administrative Control // Governance in Europe. The Role of Interest Groups. Baden-Baden, 2004.
 Tapp J., Levin F. Legal Socialization: Strateqies for an Ethical Leqality // Stanford Law Review. 1974. Vol. 27. № 1.
 Yakovlev A.A., Sobolev A.S., Kazun A. Means of Production versus Means of Coercion: Can Russian Business Limit the Violence of a Predatory State? // Post-Soviet Affairs. 2013. Vol. 30. Issue 2–3.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate