FROM SOCIAL LIBERALISM TOWARDS THE PHILOSOPHY OF COLLABORATION
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
FROM SOCIAL LIBERALISM TOWARDS THE PHILOSOPHY OF COLLABORATION
Annotation
PII
S086904990000616-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
41-64
Abstract
It is shown that the evolution of modern developed societies results into reduction of the role of centralized governance as well as economic and political competition, whereas the role of collaboration mechanisms is growing. This process is supported by cultural changes: increasing trust, internalization of honesty norms, and thus mitigates the problem of free-riding. Collectivism and individualism in their extreme forms are being replaced by the culture of constructive collaboration and compromise. The cultural transformation creates new institutions and, at the same time, is supported by them. Thereby the failures of market, state and parliamentary democracy are being gradually overcome. Instead of social liberalism, which refl ects just a certain stage of this process and operates mainlyby such extremes as the individual – the state or the state – the market, a more general view – the philosophy of collaboration (collaborativism) is suggested.
Keywords
social liberalism, anarchism, collaboration, competition, collectivism, individualism, bankruptcy law, antimonopoly legislation, majority rule, parliamentary committee, institutional evolution
Date of publication
01.07.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1111
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

1

References



Additional sources and materials

Avdasheva S., Shastitko A. (2009) Ugolovnoe presledovanie za narushenie antimonopol'- nogo zakonodatel'stva: vozmozhnosti i riski // Ehkonomicheskaya politika. № 5. S. 93–98.
Boulz S. (2011) Mikroehkonomika. Povedenie, instituty i ehvolyutsiya. M.: Delo.
Dam'e V.V. (2001) Anarkho-sindikalizm v XX v. M.: IVI RAN.
Drejzen A. (1995) Pochemu otkladyvayutsya reformy. Teoreticheskij analiz // Ehkonomika i matematicheskie metody. T. 31. Vyp. 3. S. 63–75.
D'yui D. (2003) Rekonstruktsiya v filosofii. Problemy cheloveka. M.: Respublika.
Zudin A.Yu. (2009) Assotsiatsii–biznes–gosudarstvo. Klassicheskie i sovremennye formy otnoshenij v stranakh Zapada. Preprint WP1/2009/05Z. M.: GU-VShEh.
Kant I. (1994). K vechnomu miru. Filosofskij proekt // Kant I. Poln. sobr. soch. V 8 t.
T. 7. M.: Choro. S. 5–56.
Kanto-Sperber M. (2004) Filosofiya liberal'nogo sotsializma // Neprikosnovennyj za- pas. № 6 (38) (http://magazines.russ.ru/nz/2004/38/kanto1. html).
Kapelyushnikov R. (2013). Povedencheskaya ehkonomika i novyj paternalizm (http://polit.ru/ article/2013/11/12/paternalism/).
Kropotkin P.A. (2002) Anarkhiya. Sbornik. M.: Ajris-press (http://www.klex.ru/7gb).
Kulisher I.M. (1922) Lektsii po istorii ehkonomicheskogo byta Zapadnoj Evropy. Ch. II.
Petrograd: Tsentral'noe kooperativnoe izdatel'stvo “Mysl'”.
Le Goff Zh. (2005) Tsivilizatsiya srednevekovogo Zapada. Ekaterinburg: U-Faktoriya.
Lukin P.V. (2012) Novgorodskoe veche v XIII–XV vv. Istoriograficheskie postroeniya i dannye ganzejskikh dokumentov // Spory o novgorodskom veche. Mezhdistsiplinarnyj dialog.
Materialy kruglogo stola. 20 sentyabrya 2010 g. Sankt-Peterburg: Evropejskij universitet v Sankt-Peterburge. S. 10–60.
Najt F.Kh. (2009) Ehtika konkurentsii. M.: Ehkonomika.
Panova A.A., Yudkevich M.M. (2011) Sistema postoyannogo najma v universitete: Modeli i argumenty // Voprosy obrazovaniya. Vyp. 1. S. 44–72.
Platon (1971) Gosudarstvo // Soch. V 3 t. Tom 3. Chast' 1. M.: Mysl'. S. 89–454.
Polterovich V.M. (2012) Proektirovanie reform: kak iskat' promezhutochnye instituty // Montenegrin Journal of Economics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 25–44.
Polterovich V.M. (2007) Ehlementy teorii reform. M.: Ehkonomika.
Popov V.V. (2011) Nado li zaschischat' prava na intellektual'nuyu sobstvennost' // Zhurnal Novoj ehkonomicheskoj assotsiatsii. № 11. C. 107–126.
Rubinshtejn A.Ya. (2012) Sotsial'nyj liberalizm: k voprosu ehkonomicheskoj metodologii // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. № 6. S. 13–34.
Smol'skij A. (2003) Bankrotstvo kak obschestvennyj institut: vozniknovenie razvitie i osobennosti funktsionirovaniya // Ehkovest. № 3–4. S. 601–620.
Sravnitel'nyj doklad o porogakh i drugikh kharakteristikakh izbiratel'nykh sistem, koto- rye prepyatstvuyut prokhozhdeniyu partij v parlament (2008). Evropejskaya komissiya. za demokra- tiyu cherez pravo (Venetsianskaya komissiya). Issledovanie № 485 / 2008. Strasburg. (http://www. venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffi le=CDL-AD(2008)037-rus).
Stiglits Dzh. (2011) Krutoe pike. Amerika i novyj ehkonomicheskij poryadok posle global'- nogo krizisa. M.: Ehksmo.
Struve P.B. (1999) Sotsial'nyj liberalizm // Struve P.B. Izbr. soch. M.: ROSSPEhN (http:// www.yabloko.ru/Publ/2006/2006_05/060522_ struve.html).
Ahlberg K., Bruun N. (2005) Sweden: Transition through collective bargaining // R. Blanpain (ed.).
Collective Bargaining and Wages in Comparative Perspective. Germany, France, The Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom. The Hague (The Netherlands): Kluwer Law International. 192 pp. (http://arbetsratt.juridicum.su.se/filer/pd f/kerstin%20ahlberg/ transition%20 through%20 collective%20bargaining.pdf).
Anechiarico F., Jacobs J.B. (1996) The pursuit of absolute integrity: how corruption control makes government ineffective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Axelrod R. (2006) The Evolution of Cooperation. Revised Edition. New York: Basic Books.
Biesenbender J. (2011) The Dynamics of Treaty Change: Measuring the Distribution of Power in the European Union? // European Integration online Papers (EIoP). Vol. 15. Article 5 (http://eiop.or.at/ eiop/texte/2011–005a.htm).
Bortis H. (2009) From neo-liberal Capitalism to Social Liberalism on the basis of Classical- Keynesian Political Economy. Université de Fribourg / Switzerland (http://www.unifr.ch/withe/assets/ fi les/Publikationen/From_neolib eral_Capitalism_to_Socia_Liberalism.pdf).
Brülhart M. (2008) An Account of Global Intra-industry Trade, 1962–2006. Research paper series. The University of Nottingham.
Chang H.-J. (2003) Kicking Away the Ladder: development strategies in historical perspective.
London: Anthem Press.
Chatman J.A., Barsade S.G. (1995) Personality, Organizational Culture, and Cooperation: Evidence from a Business Simulation // Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 40. Pp. 423–443.
Claessens S.L., Klapper F. (2002) Bankruptcy Around the World: Explanations of its Relative Use. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2865. July.
Davidson D. (1993) Antitrust policy and real health care reform // Health Affairs. Project HOPE.
Vol. 12. No. 3. Pp. 144–145.
Deutsch M. (2012) A Theory of Cooperation-Competititon and Beyond // Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Vol. 2. Chapter 40. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Dolgoff S. (2001) The Relevance of Anarchism to Modern Society. Tucson, AZ: Sharp Press.
Easterly W. (2001) The Elusive Quest for Growth. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Freeman M., Pearson R., Taylor J. (2006) The limitation of liability in British joint-stock companies, 1720–1844. XIV International Economic History Congress, Helsinki (http://www.helsinki. fi /iehc2006/papers2/Pearson.pdf).
Hahnel R. (2005) Economic Justice and Democracy: from Competition to Cooperation. New York: Routledge.
Hobhouse L.T. (1911) Social Evolution and Political Theory. New York: Columbia University Press (http://www.isec.ac.in/B-Social%20evolution%20and %20political%20theory.pdf).
Knott J.H., Miller G.J. (1987) Reforming Bureaucracy. The Politics of Institutional Choice.
Prentice-Hall–Englewood Cliffs (New Jersey).
Lichtenstein N. (2013) State of the Union: a Century of American Labor. Prinston (New Jersey): Princeton University Press.
Lijphart A. (2012) Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. Second Edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Longley L.D., Davidson R.H. (1998) Parliamentary Committees: Changing Perspective on Changing Institutions // The New Roles of Parliamentary Committees. London: F. Cass. Pp. 1–20.
Mattson I., Strom K. (1995) Parliamentary Committees. // Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Mannheim: University of Mannheim. Pp. 249–307 (http://www.uni-potsdam.de/db/ vergleich/Publikationen/Parliaments/PMR-W-Europe.pdf).
McKelvey R.D. (1976) Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control // Journal of Economic Theory. No. 12. Pp. 472–482.
Metcalfe J.S., Ramlogan R., Uyarra E. (2002) Economic development and the competitive process. University of Manchester. Centre on Regulation and Competition. Working Paper Series.
Paper no. 36.
Motta M. (2004) Competition Policy: Theory and Practice. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. Chapter 1 (http://www.cea.fi /course/textbook/ chapter_1.pdf ).
Polterovich V., Tonis A. (2005) Hiring Strategies and the Evolution of Honesty. M.: New Economic School (http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20283/ ).
Riddle J.M. (2001) A History of the Middle Ages, 300–1500. Kitchener (Canada): Batoche Books.
Shavitt Sh., Carlos J., Riemer T.H. (2010) Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism: Implications for Understanding Psychological Processes // Advances in Culture and Psychology. Vol. 1.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Society at a Glance 2011: OECD Social Indicator (2011) (http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/ sites/soc_glance-2011-en/08/01/index.html? itemId=/content/chapter/soc_glance-2011–26-en&_ csp_=7d6a863ad60f09c08a8e 2c78701e4faf).
Stiglitz J. (1998) Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government. The Private Uses of Public Interests: Incentives and Institutions // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol.12. No. 2. Pp. 3–22.
Stiglitz J. (2003) Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton&Company.
Tabb C.J. (1995) The History of the Bankruptcy Laws in the United States. ABI Law Review. Vol. 3. No. 5. Pp. 5–51.
Triandis H.C., Gelfand M.J. (2012) A Theory of Individualism and Collectivism // Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology . Vol. 2. Chapter 51. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate