COMPARATIVE LAW: PRESENT-DAY METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
COMPARATIVE LAW: PRESENT-DAY METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES
Annotation
PII
S086904990000616-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Edition
Pages
79-91
Abstract
The article deals with the contemporary methodological approaches in comparative legal studies, functional and culturalogical – don’t comply with the condition of the relevancy of the grounds of comparison. Only comparable objects may be compared. That’s why the object of the comparative legal studies is national legal orders based on common system of principles.
Keywords
comparative law, methodology, globalization, unification, codification, principles of law, legal transplants
Date of publication
03.03.2014
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1062
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

1

References



Additional sources and materials

Berman G. Dzh. Zapadnaya traditsiya prava: ehpokha formirovaniya. M., 1998.
Bogdandi A. fon. Doktrinal'nyj konstruktivizm v proshlom i buduschem: strategiya otveta na nasuschnye voprosy, stoyaschie pered konstitutsionno-pravovoj naukoj v Evrope // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2010. № 1.
Varlamova N.V. Pravovye kul'tury: vvedenie v sravnitel'noe izuchenie / / Voprosy pravovedeniya. 2010. № 3.
David R., Zhoffre-Spinozi K. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti. M., 1996.
Dvorkin R. O pravakh vser'ez. M., 2004.
Dozhdev D.V. Sravnitel'noe pravo: sostoyanie i perspektivy // Rossijskij ezhegodnik sravnitel'nogo prava. 2007. № 1. SPb., 2008.
Kabriyak R. Kodifikatsii. M., 2007.
Lezhe R. Velikie pravovye sistemy sovremennosti: sravnitel'no-pravovoj podkhod. M., 2009.
Mikhaehl's R. Na zapadnom fronte bez peremen? 100 let Parizhskomu kongressu sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya (razmyshleniya po povodu yubilejnoj konferentsii v Novom Orleane) // Rossijskij ezhegodnik sravnitel'nogo prava. 2007. № 1. SPb., 2008.
Osyatyn'skij V. Paradoksy konstitutsionnogo zaimstvovaniya // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2004. № 3.
Slyschenkov V.A. Metody sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya: zamechaniya o kul'turologicheskom podkhode k sravnitel'nomu pravu // Ezhegodnik sravnitel'nogo prava. 2011. M., 2011.
Syukiyajnen L.R. Islamskoe pravo: vzaimodejstvie yuridicheskogo i religioznogo nachal // Ezhegodnik libertarno-yuridicheskoj teorii. Vyp. 1. M., 2007.
Tzen-Ta Li D. Tolkovanie aktov o pravakh cheloveka: znachenie sravnitel'nogo podkhoda // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2007. № 3.
Frankenberg G. Kriticheskie sravneniya. Popytka ozhivit' sravnitel'noe pravovedenie // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2004a. № 3.
Frankenberg G. Kriticheskie sravneniya. Popytka ozhivit' sravnitel'noe pravovedenie // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2004b. № 4.
Khasebe Ya. Konstitutsionnye zaimstvovaniya i politicheskaya teoriya / / Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2005. № 4.
Tsvajgert K., Kyotts Kh. Vvedenie v sravnitel'noe pravovedenie v sfere chastnogo prava. V 2 t. T. I. Osnovy. M., 2000.
Chestnov I.L. Kriterii sovremennosti pravoponimaniya: sovremenna li integrativnaya kontseptsiya prava // Filosofiya prava v Rossii: istoriya i sovremennost'. Materialy tret'ikh filosofsko-pravovykh chtenij pamyati akademika V.S. Nersesyantsa. M., 2009.
Shirvindt A.M. Sravnitel'noe pravovedenie kak nauchnaya distsiplina i unifikatsiya chastnogo prava (po povodu raboty R. Tsimmermanna “Evropeizatsiya chastnogo prava i sravnitel'noe pravovedenie”) [Zimmermann R. Die Europ äisierung des Privatrechts und die Rechtsvergleichung.
De Gruyter Recht. Berlin, 2006. 58 s.] // Rossijskij ezhegodnik sravnitel'nogo prava. 2007. № 1. SPb., 2008.
Shul'tse-Filits Kh. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe pravo – ulitsa s odnostoronnim dvizheniem? Na primere soblyudeniya printsipa chelovecheskogo dostoinstva v biomeditsinskikh issledovaniyakh // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2004. № 4.
Bell J. Mechanisms for Cross-Fertilisation of Administrative Law in Europe // New Directions in European Public Law. Oxford, 1998.
Choudhry S. Globalization in Search of Jurisdiction: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation // Indiana Law Journal. 1999. Vol. 74. № 3.
Goff A. Coming Together – the Future // The Clifford Chance Millennium Lectures. The Coming Together of the Common Law and the Civil Law. Oxford–Portland (Oreg.), 2000.
Goodin R. Designing Constitutions: the Political Constitution of a Mixed Commonwealth // Constitutionalism and Transformation: European and Theoretical Perspectives. Blackwell, 1996.
Legrand P. Comparative Legal Studies and Commitment to Theory // Modern Law Review. 1995. Vol. 58. № 2.
Legrand P. Fragments on Law-as-Culture. Deventer, 1999.
Legrand P. The Same and the Differend // Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge, 2003.
Legrand P. What Legal Transplants? // Adapting Legal Cultures. Oregon, 2001.
Michaels R. The Functional Method of Comparative Law // The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford, 2006.
Murray J. Ginsberg Renews Defense of Foreign Law Citations // The Bulletin. April 13, 2009.
Ramraj V.V. Comparative Constitutional Law in Singapore // Singapore Journal of International and Comparative Law. 2002. Vol. 6. № 1.
Reimann M. The Progress and Failure of Comparative Law in the Second Half of Twentieth Century // American Journal of Comparative Law. 2003. Vol. 50.
Sacco R. One Hundred Years of Comparative Law // Tulane Law Review. 2000–2001. Vol. 75.
Sanders Ch. Constitutional Culture in Transition // Constitutional Cultures. Warzawa, 2001.
Schlechtriem P. Directives, Common Principles, and Law Reform // Tulane Law Review. 2000– 2001. Vol. 75.
Van Hoecke M., Warrington M. Legal Cultures, Legal Paradigms and Legal Doctrine: Towards a New Model of Comparative Law // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1998. Vol. 47.
Waldron J. Foreign Law and the Modern Jus Gentium // Harvard Law Review. 2005. Vol. 119. № 1.
Watson A. Legal Transplants. An Approach to Comparative Law. Athens–London, 1993.
Weinrib L.E. Constitutional Conceptions and Constitutional Comparativism // Defi ning the Field of Comparative Constitutional Law. Westport, 2002.
Witte B. de. The Lisbon Treaty and National Constitutions. More or Less Europeanisation? // The Lisbon Treaty and National Constitutions. Europeanisation and Democratic Implication. Oslo, 2009.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate