References

Additional sources and materials

Bekker G. Ehkonomicheskij analiz i chelovecheskoe povedenie // THESIS. 1993. T. 1. Vyp. 1.
 Nort D. Instituty, institutsional'nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ehkonomiki. M., 1997.
 Safonov M. Sovremennye podkhody k izucheniyu mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij // Mezhduna­rodnye protsessy. 2003. T. 1. № 1 (1) (http://www.intertrends.ru/one/006.htm).
 Tambovtsev V. Ehkonomicheskaya teoriya kontrol'no-nadzornoj deyatel'nosti gosudarstva // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2004. № 4.
 Abbott K.W. Enriching Rational Choice Institutionalism for the Study of International Law // Univer­sity of Illinois Law Review. 2008. № 1.
 Abbott K.W. Toward a Richer Institutionalism for International Law and Policy // Journal of Interna­tional Law and International Relations. 2005. Vol. 1. № 1-2.
 Alvarez J.E. Do Liberal States Behave Better? A Critique of Slaughter’s Liberal Theory // European Journal of International Law. 2001. Vol. 12. № 2.
 Alvarez J.E. Do States Socialize? // Duke Law Journal. 2005. Vol. 54.
 Berman P.S. A Pluralist Approach to International Law // The Yale Journal of International Law. 2007. Vol. 32.
 Chayes A., Chayes A.H. On Compliance // International Organization. 1993. Vol. 47. № 2.
 Clark I. Legitimacy in a Global Order // Review of International Studies. 2003. Vol. 29.
 Coase R.H. The Problem of Social Cost // Journal of Law and Economics. 1960. Vol. 3. № 1.
 Cogan J.K. Noncompliance and the International Rule of Law // The Yale Journal of International Law. 2006. Vol. 31.
 Cox D., O’Neil A. The Unhappy Marriage between International Relations Theory and International Law // Global Change. Peace & Security. 2008. Vol. 20. № 2.
 Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge, 2006.
 Downs G., Rocke D.M., Barsoom P.N. Is the Good News about Compliance Good News about Coope­ration? // International Organization. 1995. Vol. 50. № 1.
 Downs G.W., Jones M.A. Reputation, Compliance, and International Law // Journal of Legal Studies. 2002. Vol. 31.
 Dunoff J.L., Trachtman J.P. Economic Analysis of International Law: An Invitation and a Caveat. SSRN. 1998. April (http://ssrn.com/abstract=73688).
 Franck T.M. Fairness in International Law and Institutions. Oxford, 1997.
 Franck T.M. Legitimacy in the International System // American Journal of International Law. 1988.
 Vol. 82. № 4.
 Freschmann B. A Dynamic Institutional Theory of International Law // Buffalo Law Review. 2003. Vol. 51.
 Garoupa N. The Theory of Optimal Law Enforcement // Journal of Economic Surveys. 1997. Vol. 11.
 Goldsmith J.L., Posner E.A. Introduction // Journal of Legal Studies. 2002. Vol. 31.
 Goodman R., Jinks D. How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law // Duke Law Journal. 2005a. Vol. 54.
 Goodman R., Jinks D. International Law and State Socialization: Conceptual, Empirical, and Norma­tive Challenges // Duke Law Journal. 2005b. Vol. 54.
 Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics. Cambridge, 1992.
 Guzman AT. International Law: A Compliance Based Theory // UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper. 2001. № 47.
 Guzman A. T. Saving Customary International Law // UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper. 2005. April. № 708721.
 Hathaway O.A. Between Power and Principle: An Integrated Theory of International Law // The Uni­versity of Chicago Law Review. 2005. Vol. 72.
 Hathaway O.A. Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? Boston University School of Law. 2002. № 02-03.
 Jepperson R., Wendt A., Katzenstein P. Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security // The Cul­ture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York, 1996.
 Keohane R.O. Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World. London-New York, 2002b.
 Keohane R.O. Rational Choice Theory and International Law: Insights and Limitations // Journal of Legal Studies. 2002a. Vol. 31.
 Keohane R.O., Nye J.S., Jr. Power and Interdependence in the Information Age // Foreign Affairs. 1998. Vol. 77. № 5.
 Keohane R.O., Nye J.S. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston, 1977.
 Koh H.H. How Is International Human Rights Law Enforced? // Indiana Law Journal. 1998. Vol. 74. № 4.
 Koh H.H. Internalization through Socialization // Duke Law Journal. 2005. Vol. 54.
 Koh H.H. Why Do Nations Obey International Law? (Review Essay) // Yale Law Journal. 1997. Vol. 106. № 8.
 Koskenniemi M. The Fate of Public International Law: Constitutional Utopia or Fragmentation? // Chorley Lecture 2006. London School of Economics (http://www.helsinki.fi/eci/Publications/MKChor- ley%20Text-06a.pdf).
 Krasner S.D., Pascual C. Addressing State Failure // Foreign Affairs. 2005. Vol. 84. № 4.
 Macaulay S. Non-contractual Relations in Business; a Preliminary Study // American Sociological Review. 1963. Vol. 28. № 1.
 Malkin H W. Reservations to Multilateral Conventions // British Yearbook of International Law. 1926. Vol. 7.
 March J.G., Olsen J.P. The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders // International Organizations. 1998. Vol. 52. № 4.
 Mitchell S.M., Hensel P.R. International Institutions and Compliance with Agreements // American Journal of Political Science. 2007. Vol. 51. № 4.
 Morgenthau H., Thompson K. Politics Among Nations. New York, 1985.
 Ochoa ë. The Individual and Customary International Law Formation // Virginia Journal of Interna­tional Law. 2007. Vol. 48. № 1.
 Oeter S. Toward a Richer Institutionalism for International Law and Policy // University of Illinois Law Review. 2008. № 1.
 Parisi F. The Formation of Customary Law. Paper presented at 96th Annual Conference of ihe American Political Science Association. Washington, August 31-September 3, 2000.
 Picciotto S. International Law: The Legitimation of Power in World Affairs // The Critical Lawyers’ Handbook. 1997. Vol. 2.
 Polinsky M., Shavell S. The Economic Theory of Public Enforcement of Law // Journal of Economic Literature. 2000. Vol. 38. № 3.
 Posner R. Some Economics of International Law: Comment on Conference Papers // Journal of Legal Studies. 2002. Vol. 31.
 Posner E.A., Goldsmith J.L.III. A Theory of Customary International Law // University of Chicago Law School. John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper. 1998. November. № 63.
 Posner R.A., Rasmusen E.B. Creating and Enforcing Norms, with Special Reference to Sanctions // International Review of Law and Economics. 1999. Vol. 19. № 3.
 Powell R. Anarchy in International Relations Theory: the Neorealist-neoliberal Debate // Internatio­nal Organization. 1994. Vol. 48. № 2.
 Putnam R.D. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two Level Games // International Organization. 1988. Vol. 42. № 3.
 Rasmusen E. How Optimal Penalties Change with the Amount of Harm // International Review of Law and Economics. 1995. Vol. 15. № 1.
 Risse T. ‘Let’s Argue?’: Communicative Action in World Politics // International Organization. 2000. Vol. 54. № 1.
 Sandler T. Treaties: Strategic Consideration // University of Illinois Law Review. 2008. № 1.
 Sykes A.O. The Economics of Public International Law // The University of Chicago. The Law School. 2004. July. WP № 216.
 Telset L.G. A Theory of Self-Enforcing Agreements // Journal of Business. 1980. Vol. 53. № 1.
 Thompson A. Applying Rational Choice Theory to International Law: The Promise and Pitfalls // Journal of Legal Studies. 2002. Vol. 31.
 Thürer D. Soft Law // Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Vol. 4. Amsterdam, 2000.
 Van Aaken A., Engel C, Ginsburg T. Public International Law and Economics: Symposium Introduc­tion // University of Illinois Law Review. 2008. № 1.
 Waltz K. Structural Realism after the Cold War // International Security. 2000. Vol. 25. № 1.
 Xinyuan Dai. Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism // International Organization. 2005. Vol. 59. № 1.
 Zacher M.W., Matthew R.A. Liberal International Theory: Common Threads. Divergent Strands // Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. New York, 1995.