ECONOMIC IMPERIALISM WITHOUT IMPERIAL AMBITIONS
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
ECONOMIC IMPERIALISM WITHOUT IMPERIAL AMBITIONS
Annotation
PII
S086904990000617-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Edition
Pages
130-139
Abstract
Общественные науки и современность, ECONOMIC IMPERIALISM WITHOUT IMPERIAL AMBITIONS
Date of publication
01.11.2009
Number of purchasers
0
Views
941
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

1

References



Additional sources and materials

Kirkhner K. Trudnosti vospriyatiya distsipliny “pravo i ehkonomika” v Germanii // Istoki. Ehkonomika v kontekste istorii i kul'tury. M., 2004.
Libman A. Sovremennaya ehkonomicheskaya teoriya: osnovnye tendentsii // Voprosy ehkonomi­ki. 2007. № 3.
Mill' D.S. Ob opredelenii predmeta politicheskoj ehkonomii i o metode issledovaniya, svojstvennom ej // Mill'D.S. Osnovy politicheskoj ehkonomii (s nekotorymi prilozheniyami k sotsial'noj filosofii). M., 2007.
Mirskij Eh.M. Mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya i distsiplinarnaya organizatsiya nauki. M., 1980.
Pavlov I. Povedencheskaya teoriya - pozitivnyj podkhod k issledovaniyu ehkonomicheskoj deya­tel'nosti // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2007. № 3.
Pozner R. O primenenii ehkonomicheskoj teorii i zloupotreblenii eyu pri analize prava // Istoki. Ehkonomika v kontekste istorii i kul'tury. M., 2004.
Smit A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov. M., 2007.
Sheffer G.-B. Ehffektivnost' kak pravovaya norma // Istoki. Ehkonomika v kontekste isto­rii i kul'tury. M., 2004.
Calabresi G. Some Thoughts of Risk Distribution and the Law of Torts // Yale Law Journal. 1961. Vol. 70. № 4.
Coase R.H. Economics and Contiguous Disciplines // Essays on Economics and Economists. Chicago, 1994.
Coase R.H. The Problem of Social Cost // Journal of Law and Economics. 1960. Vol. 3. № 1.
Davis J. The Turn in Economics: Neoclassical Dominance to Mainstream Pluralism // Journal of Institutional Economics. 2006. Vol. 2. № 1.
Hirshleifer J. The Expanding Domain of Economics // The American Economic Review. 1985. Vol. 75. № 6.
JoannidesS., Nielsen K. Economics and the Social Sciences: Synergies and Trade-offs // Economics and the Social Sciences: Boundaries, Interaction and Integration. Cheltenham-Northampton, 2007.
Lazear E. Economic Imperialism // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2000. Vol. 115. № 1.
Maki U. Explanatory Unification: Double and Doubtful // Philosophy of Social Sciences. 2001. Vol. 31. № 4.
Ozveren E. Where Disciplinary Boundaries Blur: the Environmental Dimension of Institutional Economics // Economics and the Social Sciences: Boundaries, Interaction and Integration. Cheltenham- Northampton, 2007.
Rojas F. Sociological Imperialism in Three Theories of the Market // Journal of Institutional Economics. 2006. Vol. 2. № 3.
Swedberg R. The New “Battle of Methods” // Challenge. January-February. 1990.
Zilberman D. Economics and Interdisciplinary Collaborative Efforts // Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1994. Vol. 26. № 1.
Zoubolakis M. Contesting the Autonomy of Political Economy: the Early Positivist Criticism of Economic Knowledge // European Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2008. Vol. 15. № 1.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate