Везде
Иск в защиту общественных интересов как метод борьбы с коррупцией
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Иск в защиту общественных интересов как метод борьбы с коррупцией
Annotation
PII
S086904990000617-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Evgenij Kuznetsov  Petr Filippov
Edition
Issue 5
Pages
59-65
Abstract
The article discusses the problems of claims in favor of an indefi nite number of persons in modernRussia. The authors note the effectiveness of this legal mechanism to combat the abuse and corruption.At the same time they emphasize the presence of obstacles, which linked its use in Russia, de factoban on fi ling such lawsuits by individual citizens, the general weakness of legal regulation of thiscategory of claims. As a possible reference point for law reform the practice of Anglo-Saxon familyis considered.
Keywords
corruption, actions in defense of an indefi nite number of persons, class actions.
Date of publication
15.09.2020
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1040
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
0 RUB / 0.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2011
Subscription benefits
0 RUB /  SU
1

References



Additional sources and materials

Аболонин Г.А. Массовые иски. М., 2011.
Елисеев Н.Г. Гражданское процессуальное право зарубежных стран. Учебник. (2-е изд.,перераб. и доп.). М., 2006.
Петрухин И.Л. Исторический очерк деятельности прокуратуры // Отечественные записки. 2003. № 2.
Cook Ltd. v. Niedert. Nos. 97-1666, 97-1667 and 97-1584. Argued October 30, 1997–April 24, 1998 (http://caselaw.fi ndlaw.com/us-7th-circuit/1286046.html).
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 23. Class Actions // (http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule23.htm).
Eisenberg T., Miller G.P. Attorney Fees in Class Action Settlements: an Empirical Study // Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 2004. № 1.
Gidi A. Class Actions in Brazil – a Model for Civil Law Countries // American Journal of Comparative Law. 2003. Vol. 51.
Merryman J.H. On the Convergence (and the Divergence) of the Civil Law and the Common Law // Stanford Journal of International Law. 1981. Vol. 17.
Newberg H.B., Conte A. Newberg on Class Actions. New York, 1992.
Silberman L. 7 Vicissitudes of the American Class Action // With a Comparative Eye, 1999. Vol. 7.
Watson G.D. Class Actions: the Canadian Experience // Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law Articles. 2001.
Yeazell S.C. From Medieval Group Litigation to the Modern Class Action. New Haven, 1987.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate