Везде
FORMATION OF THE GENERAL SOCIAL ANALYSIS
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
FORMATION OF THE GENERAL SOCIAL ANALYSIS
Annotation
PII
S086904990000617-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Victor Polterovich 
Edition
Issue 2
Pages
101-111
Abstract
In this paper, it is shown that the concept “economic imperialism” has no real content withepistemological point of view: there is no evidence of using specifi c economic methodology in areasof other social disciplines. Economics is in a permanent crisis caused by the impossibility to answerits most important questions if one remains in its own area. However, social disciplines have now notonly common subject of research, but also common empirical base and a unifi ed analytical apparatus. Preconditions are created to form General Social Analysis as a discipline about functioning anddevelopment of social institutions and about behavior of human collectives in their frameworks.
Keywords
economic crisis, crisis of economics, economic imperialism, methodological individualism, game theory, Sonnensсhein–Mantel–Debreu theorem
Date of publication
15.03.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1090
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion
1

References



Additional sources and materials

Anan'in O.I. Za “ehkonomicheskij imperializm” bez imperskikh ambitsij, ili O formakh mezhdistsiplinarnykh vzaimodejstvij // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2009. № 6.
 Bekker G.S. Chelovecheskoe povedenie: ehkonomicheskij podkhod. Izbrannye trudy po ehkonomicheskoj teorii. M., 2003.
 Vasin A.A. Ehvolyutsionnaya teoriya igr i ehkonomika. Ch. 2. Ustojchivost' ravnovesij. Osobennosti ehvolyutsii sotsial'nogo povedeniya // Zhurnal Novoj ehkonomicheskoj assotsiatsii. 2010. № 5.
 Glaz'ev S.Yu. O programme antikrizisnykh mer // Zhurnal Novoj ehkonomicheskoj assotsiatsii. 2009. № 1–2.
 Grinberg R.S., Rubinshtejn A.Ya. Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiodinamika. M., 2000.
 Dement'ev V.D. Dlinnye volny ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya i finansovye puzyri // Preprint #WP/2009/252. M., TsEhMI RAN. 
 Libman A.M. Granitsy distsiplin i granitsy soobschestv (Dva aspekta “ehkonomicheskogo imperializma”) // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2010. № 1.
 Najt F. Ehtika konkurentsii. M., 2009.
 Nejman Dzh., Morgenshtern O. Teoriya igr i ehkonomicheskoe povedenie. M., 1970.
 Polterovich V.M. Gipoteza ob innovatsionnoj pauze i strategiya modernizatsii // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2009. № 6.
 Polterovich V.M. Krizis ehkonomicheskoj teorii // Ehkonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoj Rossii. 1998. № 1.
 Polterovich V.M. Ehlementy teorii reform. M., 2007.
 Radaev V.V. Ehkonomicheskie imperialisty nastupayut! Chto delat' sotsiologam? // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2008a. № 6.
 Radaev V.V. Vozmozhna li pozitivnaya programma dlya rossijskoj sotsiologii? // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2008b. № 7.
 Rozov N.S. Ot distsiplinarnogo imperializma – k Obschestvoznaniyu Bez Granits! (”Shengenskij” proekt integratsii sotsial'nykh nauk) // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2009. № 3.
 Tambovtsev V.L. Perspektivy “ehkonomicheskogo imperializma” // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2008. № 5.
 Altruism, Morality, and Economic Theory. New York, 1975.
 Besley T., Hennessy P. Her Majesty the Queen… 2009 (http://media.ft.com/cms/3e3b6ca8-7a08-11de-b86f-00144feabdc0.pdf).
 Cochrane J.H. How did Paul Krugman Get it So Wrong? (http://modeledbehavior.com/2009/09/11/john-cochrane-responds-to-paul-krugman-full-text/).
 Dalziel P., Higgins J. Pareto, Parsons, and the Boundary Between Economics and Sociology // American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2006. Vol. 65. № 1.
 Debreu G. Excess Demand Functions // Journal of Mathematical Economics. 1974. № 1.
 Gayle V., Lambert P.S. Logistic Regression Models in Sociological Research (http://www.dames.org.uk/docs/tech_papers/DAMES_tp2009-1.pdf).
 Krugman P. How did Economists Get it So Wrong? The New York Times, September 2, 2009. (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/06/magazine/06Economic-t.html?_r=1).
 Lazear E.P. Economic Imperialism // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2000. Vol. 115. № 1.
 Lucas R. Macroeconomic Priorities // American Economic Review. 2003. Vol. 93. № 1 (http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/brian.barry/igm/ditella.pdf).
 Rubinstein A. Modeling Bounded Rationality. MIT, 1998.
 Skirbekk S. “Crisis of sociology” – and consequences for an adequate understanding of contemporary cultural confl icts // Journal of Sociology. 2008. № 3.
 Swedberg R. Economics and Sociology: redefi ning their boundaries (interviews with Gary Becker… Oliver E. Williamson… Kenneth J. Arrow…) (http://books.google.com/books?id=j6V2rQEu2tUC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Richard+Swedberg+(1990),+Economics+and+Sociology&source=bl&ots=FrkKodvyy1&sig=mbvpBCCK4BKxWTdq5cW72SsbfVk&hl=ru&ei=AB9iTNzqIpq80gS60vGTCQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=Richard%20Swedberg%20(1990)%2C%20Economics%20and%20Sociology&f=false).
 Swedberg R. Sociology and Game Theory: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives // Theory and Society. 2001. Vol. 30.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate