References

Additional sources and materials

Asemoglu D., Dzhonson S., Robinson Dzh. Instituty kak fundamental'naya prichina dolgosrochnogo ehkonomicheskogo rosta // Ehkovest. 2006. T. 5. N 1.
 Grigor'ev L. M. Khronologiya reform. Preprint Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki WP11/2006/01.2006.
 Gryaznov Eh. A. KTNK v Rossii. Pozitsii krupnejshikh v mire transnatsional'nykh korporatsij v rossijskoj ehkonomike. M., 2000.
 D'yankov S., Glehzer Eh., La Porta R., Lopes-de-Silanes F., Shlyajfer A. Novaya komparativnaya ehkonomicheskaya teoriya // Ehkovest. 2003. T. 3. N 3.
 Inozemtsev V. Prodavtsy i pokupateli // Business Week Russia. 31 oktyabrya 2005.
 Institutsional'naya ehkonomika. M., 2005.
 Kapelyushnikov R. I. Gde nachalo togo kontsa?.. (K voprosu ob okonchanii perekhodnogo perioda v Rossii) // Voprosy ehkonomiki. 2001. N 1.
 Kuz'mina E. M. Osobennosti sovremennoj vnutripoliticheskoj situatsii v Tsentral'noj Azii i vzaimootnosheniya s Rossiej // Informatsionno-analiticheskij byulleten' Tsentra problem integratsii IMEhPI RAN. 2005. N 2.
 Pappeh Ya., Galukhina Ya. Rossijskij krupnyj biznes: sobytiya i tendentsii v 2005 g. Analiticheskij obzor TsMAKP. 2006.
 Paskhaver A., Verkhovodova L. Privatizatsiya do i posle "oranzhevoj" revolyutsii // Ehkovest. 2006. T. 5. N 2.
 Polterovich V. M. Institutsional'nye lovushki: est' li vykhod? // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2004. N 3.
 Polterovich V. M. Institutsional'nye lovushki i ehkonomicheskie reformy // Ehkonomika i matematicheskie metody. 1999. T. 35. N 2.
 Runov A. Izmeneniya sprosa na prava sobstvennosti: neoinstitutsional'nyj analiz privatizatsii // Ehkonomicheskie sub'ekty postsovetskoj Rossii (Institutsional'nyj analiz). T. 2. M., 2003.
 Sitnova I. V. Institutsional'nye izmeneniya v sovremennoj Rossii: aktivistsko-deyatel'nostnyj podkhod // Problemy politicheskoj transformatsii modernizatsii Rossii. M., 2001.
 Furman D. E. Postsovetskij politicheskij rezhim Kazakhstana. Doklad Instituta Evropy RAN N 142. M., 2004.
 Yakovlev A. Vozmozhnye strategii ehkonomicheskikh agentov po otnosheniyu k institutam korporativnogo upravleniya // Razvitie sprosa na pravovoe regulirovanie korporativnogo upravleniya v chastnom sektore. M., 2003.
 Yakovlev A. A. Vlast', biznes i dvizhuschie sily ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya v Rossii: do i posle "dela YuKOSa" // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2005. N 1.
 Andreff V. Would a Second Transition Stage Prolong the Initial Period of Post-Socialist Economic Transformation into Market Economies // European Journal of Comparative Economics. 2004. Vol. 1. N 1.
 Aslund A. Comparative Oligarchy: Russia, Ukraine and the United States. CASE Studies and Analyses 296. 2005a.
 Aslund A. The Economic Policy of Ukraine after the Orange Revolution // Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2005b. Vol. 46.
 Bayulgen O. Foreign Capital in Central Asia and the Caucasus: Curse or Blessing? // Communist and PostCommunist Studies. 2005. Vol. 38.
 Boettke P.J., Coyne C.J., Leeson P.T., Sautet F. The New Comparative Political Economy // Review of Austrian Economics. 2005. Vol. 18.
 Colombatto E. Is There and Austrian Approach to Transition? // Review of Austrian Economics. 2002. Vol. 15.
 Dallago B. Comparative Economic Systems and the New Comparative Economics // European Journal of Comparative Economics. 2004. Vol. 1. N 1.
 Dolgopyatova T.G., Iwasaki I. Exploring Russian Corporations: Interim Report on the Japan-Russia Joint Research Project on Corporate Governance and Integration Processes in the Russian Economy. Institute of Economic Research Hitotsubashi University Discussion Paper B-35. 2006.
 Economic Freedom of the World. Heritage Foundation. 2006 (http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/downloads.cfm). Fernandez R., Rodrik D. Resistance to Reforms: Status Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty // American Economic Review. 1991. Vol. 81.
 Filippov M., Ordershook P.C., Shvetsova O. Designing Federalism: A Theory of Self-Sustainable Federal Institutions. Cambridge, 2004.
 Goriaev A., Sonin K. Is Political Risk Company-Specific? The Market Side of the Yukos Affair. NES Working Paper WP/2006/59.2006.
 Hale H.A. Regime Cycle: Democracy, Autocracy and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia // World Politics. 2005. Vol. 58.
 Hellman J.S., Jones G., Kaufmann D. Are Foreign Investors and Multinationals Engaging in Corrupt Practices in Transition Economies? // Transition. 2000. May-June-July.
 Hoff K., Stiglitz G.E. The Transition from Communism: A Diagrammatic Exposition of Obstacles to the Demand for the Rule of Law. World Bank Working Paper. 2004. N 3352.
 Jones Luong P., Weinthal E. Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks, and Negotiated Institutional Change // American Political Science Review. 2004. Vol. 98.
 Kravchuk R.S. Kuchma as Economic Reformer // Problems of Post-Communism. 2005. Vol. 52.
 Kryshtanovskaya O., White S. The Rise of the Russian Business Elite // Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 2005. Vol. 38.
 Kuzio T. Ukrainian Economic Policy after the Orange Revolution: A Commentary on Aslund's Analysis // Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2005. Vol. 46.
 Kuznetsov A., Kuznetsova O. Institutions, Business and the State in Russia // Europe-Asia Studies. 2003. Vol. 55.
 La Porta R., Lopes-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. The Quality of Government // Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 1999. Vol. 15.
 La Porta R., Lopes-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. A. Trust in Large Organizations // American Economic Review. 1997. Vol. 87.
 Libman A. Ex Ante and Ex Post Institutional Convergence: Case of the Post-Soviet Space. Paper Presented at the European School on New Institutional Economics. Cargese (France), 2006a. May.
 Libman A. Zum Spannungsfeld zwischen staatlicher und privater Wirtschaft am Beispiel der post-sowjetischen Staaten. Vortrag in Rahmen der Ringvorlesung "Konfhkte in der Gegenwart und Zukunft". Marburg, 2006. Juni.
 Matos C. Post-Socialist Transformation and Institutions: Competing Approaches and Challenges. Mimeo, 2005.
 Murphy J. Illusory Transition? Elite Reconstitution in Kazakhstan, 1989 - 2002 // Europe-Asia Studies. 2006. Vol. 58.
 North D.C., Thomas R.P. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge, 1973.
 O'Loughlin J. The Regional Factor in Contemporary Ukrainian Politics: Scale, Place, Space or Bogus Effect? // Eurasian Geography and Economics. 2001. Vol. 42.
 Oberender P., Fleischmann J. Zur Notwendigkeit eines "starken" Staates im Transformations-prozess // Ordnungsokonomik als aktuelle Herausforderung. Stuttgart, 2005.
 Oleinik A. The More Things Change, The More Stay the Same: Institutional Transfers Seen Through the Lens of Reforms in Russia // Journal of Economic Issues. 2006. Vol. 15.
 Polishchuk L. Evolving Demand for Institutions in Transition Economies. Mimeo, 2002.
 Pyle W. Collective Action and Post-Communist Enterprise: The Economic Logic of Russia's Business Associations // Europe-Asia Studies. 2006. Vol. 58.
 Schattenschneider E. The Semisouvereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, 1960.
 Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. Politicians and Firms // Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1994. Vol. 59.
 Staehr C. Linkages between Political and Economic Reforms in the Post-Communist Countries. Mimeo, 2006.
 Sutela P. Did Putin's Reforms Catapult Russia to Durable Growth? BOFIT Online Paper. 2005. N 6.
 Transition Report 2006: Business in Transition. EBRD. 2006.
 Zimmer K. Eine Region und ihre Partei: Die Partei der Regionen als Donezker Elitenprojekt // Ukraine-Analysen. 2006. N 3.