1. Anan’in O. (2007) Ekonomika: nauka i/ili iskusstvo [Economics: a Science and/or an Art]. Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 11, pp. 4–24.
2. Ashley A. (1932) William James Ashley: A Life. London: P.S. King.
3. Avtonomov V. (2013) Abstrakciya – mat’ poryadka? [Is Abstraction the Mother of Order?]. Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 4, pp. 4–23.
4. Avtonomov V., Avtonomov Y. (2016) Obshchaya teoriya “sporov o metodah” v ekonomicheskoy nauke [A General Theory of Methodenstreits in Economic Science]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no. 4, pp. 5–20.
5. Backhaus J., Hansen R. (2000) Methodenstreit in der Nationalökonomie. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 307–336.
6. Balabkins N. (1988) Not by Theory Alone: the economics of Gustav von Schmoller and its legacy to America. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
7. Botticini M., Eckstein Z. (2011) Religious Norms, Human Capital and Money Lending in Jewish European History.’ The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Religion. McCleary R. M. (ed.) New York: Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 57–80.
8. Cardoso J.L., Psalidopoulos M. (2016 ) The German Historical School and European Economic Thought. London–New York: Routledge.
9. Coats A.W. (1968) The Origins and Early Development of the Royal Economic Society. The Economic Journal, vol. 78, no. 310, pp. 349–371.
10. Cunningham W. (1892a) A Plea for Pure Theory. Economic Review, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 25–41.
11. Cunningham W. (1892b) The Perversion of Economic History. The Economic Journal, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 491–506.
12. Deane P. (1983) The Scope and Method of Economic Science. The Economic Journal, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 1–12.
13. Fourcade M. (2009) Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
14. Grimmer-Solem E. (2016) Geopolitik und Nationalökonomie vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg: Plädoyer für eine transnationale Geschichte der Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Die Zeit um den Ersten Weltkrieg als Krisenzeit der Ökonomen. Trautwein H.-M. (Hg.) Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik: Neue Folge. Bd. 115 (Studien zur Entwicklung der ökonomischen Theorien XXX). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, S. 48–73.
15. Grimmer-Solem E. (2003) Imperialist Socialism of the Chair: Gustav Schmoller and German Weltpolitik, 1897–1905. Wilhelminism and Its Legacies: German Modernities, Imperialism, and Meanings of Reform, 1890–1930. Elley G., Retallack J. (eds.) New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books, pp. 107–122.
16. Groenewegen P. (1998) A Soaring Eagle: Alfred Marshall 1842–1924. Cheltenham: Elgar.
17. Guiso L., Sapienza P., Zingales L. (2006) Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 23–48.
18. Hagemann H. (2001) The Verein für Sozialpolitik from its foundation (1872) until World War I. The Spread of Political Economy and the Professionalization of Economists. Augello M., Guidi M. (eds.) London: Routledge, pp. 152–175.
19. Häuser K. (1988) Historical School and “Methodenstreit”. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, vol. 144, no. 3, pp. 532–542.
20. Heaton H. (1933) Review of: Anne Ashley, William James Ashley: A Life. London, 1932. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 842–844.
21. Kadish A. (1991) The Foundation of Birmingham’s Faculty of Commerce as a Statement on the Nature of Economics. The Manchester School, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 160–172.
22. Kadish A. (1989) Historians, Economists, and Economic History. London, New York: Routledge.
23. Kadish A. (1993) Marshall and the Cambridge Economics Tripos. The Market for Political Economy: The Advent of Economics in British University Culture, 1850–1905. Kadish A., Tribe K. (eds.) London: Routledge, pp. 137–161.
24. Koot G.M. (1982) An Alternative to Marshall: Economic History and Applied Economics at the Early LSE. Atlantic Economic Journal, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3–17.
25. Koot G.M. (1987) English Historical Economics, 1870–1926: The Rise of Economic History and Neomercantilism. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
26. Loužek M. (2011) The Battle of Methods in Economics. The Classical Methodenstreit–Menger vs. Schmoller. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 439–463.
27. Maloney J. (1976) Marshall, Cunningham, and the Emerging Economics Profession. The Economic History Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 440–451.
28. Marshall A. (1885) The Present Position of Economics, an Inaugural Lecture. London: Macmillan and Co.
29. Marshall A. (2009) Principles of Economics: Unabridged Eighth Edition. New York: Cosimo Classics.
30. Moggridge D.E. (1997) Method and Marshall // Peter Koslowski (ed.) Methodology of the Social Sciences, Ethics, and Economics in the Newer Historical School: From Max Weber and Rickert to Sombart and Rothacker. Berlin–Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 342–369.
31. Moore G. (2003) One Hundred Years from Today. History of Economics Review, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 53–68.
32. Reinert E. (2011) Kak bogatye strany stali bogatymi, i pochemu bednye strany ostayutsya bednymi [How Rich Countries Got Rich, and Why Poor Countries Stay Poor]. Moscow: GU VSE.
33. Reisman D. (1990 ) Alfred Marshall’s Mission. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
34. Schmoller G. (1888) Die Schriften von K. Menger und W. Dilthey zur Methodologie der Staats- und Sozial-Wissenschaften. Id. Zur Litteraturgeschichte der Staats- und Sozialswissenschaften. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, S. 275–302.
35. Solow R.M. (1985) Economic History and Economics. The American Economic Review, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 328–331.
Comments
No posts found