On Mythologeme of the Special Path

Obolonsky, Aleksandr

English

Home>Issue 6>On Mythologeme of the “Special Path"

On Mythologeme of the “Special Path"

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

On Mythologeme of the “Special Path"

Annotation

PII

S086904990011464-2-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Aleksandr Obolonsky Send message

Occupation: Professor
Affiliation: National Research University “HigherScholl of Economics”
Address: 20 Myasnitskaya, Moscow, Russian Federation

Edition

Issue 6

Pages

77-82

Abstract

The author contemplates on Russia's “special way” development concept. The article shows that this notion is an artificial construct propagated by engaged mass media and serves the interests of authoritarian leaders by introducing the idea of cultural determinism into mass consciousness. The author claims that Russia can abandon the “special path” imposed on it and go along a civilized development path.

Keywords

“Special Path”, pseudo-modernization, mythology, legitimating an authoritarian regime, ideology

Received

12.09.2020

Date of publication

17.12.2017

Number of purchasers

Views

1034

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Obolonsky A. On Mythologeme of the “Special Path" // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. – 2017. – Issue 6 C. 77-82 . URL: https://ons-journal.ru/s086904990011464-2-1/
MLA	Obolonsky, Aleksandr "On Mythologeme of the “Special Path"." Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. 6 (2017).:77-82.
APA	Obolonsky A. (2017). On Mythologeme of the “Special Path". Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost. no. 6, pp.77-82


	Publication text not found

References

1. Haffner S. (2016) Istoriya odnogo nemtsa. Chastniy chelovek protiv tisyachiletnego reikha [The history of one German. A particular person against a thousand-year-old reich]. St.-Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Ivаna Limbakha.

2. Klyamkin I. (2011) Demilitarizatsiya kak istoricheskaya i kulturnaya problema [Demillitarization as a historical and cultural issue]. Kuda vedyot krisis kulturi? [Where does the culture crisis lead to?]. Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo, pp. 261–275.

3. Klyuchevskiy V. (1958) Kurs russkoy istorii v 8 tomakh. T. 4 [The course of Russian history in 8 volumes]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoye izdatelstvo politicheskoy literatury.

4. Pain E. (2009) Rasputista: polemicheskiye razmishleniya o predopredelennosti puti Rossii [Season of bad roads: polemics on predestination of Russia's way]. Moscow: Rossijskaya politicheskaya entsiklopedia.

5. Peccei A. (1985) Chelovecheskiye kachestva [Human qualities]. Moscow: Progress.

6. Popper K. (1992) Otkritoye obshestvo i ego vragi. V 2-kh t. T. 1 [Open society and its enemies]. Moscow: Feniks.

7. Yakovenko I. (2011) Russkaya repressivnaya kultura i modernizatsiya [Russian repressive culture and modernization]. Kuda vedyot krisis kulturi? [Where does the culture crisis lead to?]. Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo, pp. 191–210.

8. Zaostrovtsev A. (2014) Istoria po Asemoglu – Robinsonu: instituti, razvitiye i predeli avtoritarnogo rosta [The history according to Asemoglu-Robinson: institutions, development, and the limits of authoritarian growth]. Obshestveniye nauki i sovremenonst', no. 3, p. 32–43.

9. Zaostrovtsev A. (2014) O razvitii i otstalosti. Kak economisti ob' jasniayut istoriyu? [On development and backwardness. How do economists explain history?]. Moscow: M-Tsentr.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review

Translate

References

Comments

Via social network