Phenomenology as the Basis of Political Economy
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Phenomenology as the Basis of Political Economy
Annotation
PII
S086904990011591-2-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Paul Usanov 
Occupation: Associate Professor, Head
Affiliation:
Department of Economics at National Research University “Higher School of Economics” (St. Petersburg)
Hayek Institute for Economy and Law
Address: 3, Kantemirovskaya st., St. Petersburg, 190008, Russian Federation
Edition
Pages
131-141
Abstract

This article contains philosophical justifi cation of modern economic theory as well as contemplations on the two possible solutions to the problem of microeconomics justifi cation. The fi rst case describes positivism as microeconomics justifi cation, and the second – phenomenological justifi cation of Austrian political economy. The perspectives of subjective method are given. The main feature of this method is that all the notions in economic theory and in activity theory are received in a deductive way from activity axiom. The very axiom is based on the phenomenological reduction.

Keywords
phenomenology, praxeology, Austrian economics, methodology, psychology
Received
16.09.2020
Date of publication
17.12.2015
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1099
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2015

Publication text not found

References

1. Friedman M. (1994) Metodologia pozitivnoy economicheskoi nauki. [Methodology of Economics]. THESIS, no. 4, pp. 20–52.

2. Hayek F. A. (1988) The Fatal Conceit. The Errors of Socialism. London: Routledge.

3. Hayek F.A. (2003) Conterrevolucia nauki. Etudi o zloupotreblenii razumom. [Contrerrevolution of Science: Essays on abuses of Reason]. Moscow: OGI.

4. Hayek F.A. (2006) Pravo, zakonodatelstvo i svoboda [Law, Legislation, and Liberty]. Moscow: Sotsium.

5. Huerta de Soto J. (2008) Sotsialism, economicheski raschet i predprinimatelskaya funkcia [Socialism, Economic Calculation, and enterpreneurship]. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium.

6. Husserl E. (2001a) Kartezianskie meditazii. [Cartesian Meditations]. St. Petersburg: Nauka.

7. Husserl E. (2011) Logicheskie issledovania. T. 1. Prologomeni k chistoy logike. [Logical Investigations. First Volume. Introduction to the pure logic]. Moscow: Academical Project.

8. Husserl E. (2001b) Logicheskie issledovania. T. 2. Issledovania po fenomenologii i teorii poznania [Logical Investigations. Second Volume. Investigations in Phenomenology and Epistemology]. Moscow: Dom intellectualnoy knigi.

9. Husserl E. (2004) Osnovnye problemi fenomenologii [Basic problems of phenomenology]. St. Petersburg: SPbGU.

10. Hyulsman Gv. (2013) Posledniy ricar liberalisma: zhizn i idei Lyudviga fon Mizesa [Mises: The Last Knight of Liberalism]. Moscow, Chelyabinsk: Sotsium.

11. Mises L. (2005) Chelovecheskaya deyanelnost [Human Action]. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium.

12. Rainah A. (2006) Apriornie osnovanya grazhdanskogo prava [Apriori of Civil Law]. Moscow: St. Thomas Institute.

13. Rakviashvili A. (2010) Liberalism: evolucia idei [Liberalim: Evolution of Ideas]. Moscow: LENAND.

14. Shuts A. (2004) Smislovoe stroenie socialnogo mira [Signafi cance of the Structure of Social World]. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia.

15. Usanov P. (2010) Fenomenologia kak metod politicheskoy economii avstriiskoi shkoli [Phenomenology as a method of Austrian School political economy]. Sub”ektivnaya politicheskaya economia, fi losofi ya i tvorchestvo [The subjective political economy, philosophy and creativity]. St. Petersburg: Info-da.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate